Impeach Trump


1st Session


H. R. ______


To Impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States.


January 3, 2019

Mr. DRIESSEN introduces the following bill; which shall be referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary


To bring about a vote of House of Representatives to pass this resolution, H.Res. ____, initially giving its Judiciary Committee authority to investigate whether sufficient grounds exist to impeach President Donald J. Trump Sr. for high crimes and misdemeanors, as documented within the text, citations and sources of the Articles of Impeachment within this Resolution; that if the committee does in fact find the Articles of this Resolution to be sufficient to cause the President’s impeachment in their opinion; then finally this resolution to impeach the president on said grounds shall be scheduled for a vote by the full legislative body of the House of Representatives if and when the House of Representatives does in fact vote for the Judiciary Committee investigation and the committee finds sufficient grounds and the Body of the House does vote to impeach President Donald Trump, in addition to the result of the House passing this Act to Impeach President Donald Trump; the content of this Resolution and any additional factual grounds to be determined by the committee and the House of Representatives as a whole shall be exhibited, delivered to the Senate and we shall wait for their decision to, or not to, bring the President to trial for said accusations of high crimes and misdemeanors as detailed within the content of this resolution and any resulting continuing investigation in accordance with Article 1, Section 3, Clause 6 of the United States Constitution. We are not vilifying everyone in the government nor private corporate life, we just want our Constitutionally guaranteed rights and reasonable application of the United States Code of laws to be honored, we want equal protection of the laws, all though the US Constitution clearly states that no one is above the law, in the case of a President breaking the law, impeachment is the only constitutional recourse. We believe that the Articles with end notes and sources of information attached will convince the majority and super majorities of the House of Representatives and the Senate to take action necessary to preserve this union, this nation, as a Constitutional Republic requiring the Impeachment of Donald Trump and as well as all cabinet members who offered little to no resistance to and are therefore accomplices to Trump’s illegal acts as President1.


This Act may be cited as the “Impeach Donald Trump Act”.


Since the founding of the United States of America, there always has been great leniency, great leeway concerning the executive branches interpretation and enforcement of internal the laws, as well as to their authority and conduct concerning international policy, treaties and relationships, an amount of acquiescence given to the President and the executive branch from the other to branches of government and allowed them by the people themselves. None the less the constitution does clearly state through Article 2, Section 4 that the president is not above the law and when a Resolution containing Articles of Impeachment clearly states that words, actions and even executive orders of the President are in violation of the Constitution as well as of federal code written into law; when such evidence is submitted to Congress, they will be impelled to take action and vote to impeach a sitting president. In the least when the following Articles and sections of this Resolution are considered, I believe the Congressional bodies will come to order and agree that if anybody other than the President, any other President, flaunted the law to the extent Trump has, they would be criminally prosecuted. It would be far simpler to place the entire blame on Donald Trump, he is not the cause of the problem, only a symptom. In fact an unbiased factual history of the United States of America is far from a beacon of egalitarian principles and human rights. Bringing an end to a tyrannical dictatorial president as proven so by the Articles of this resolution will not prevent and bring and end to such despotism hiding behind the preamble, We The People of the United States, being used by a very small elite portion of the population to justify their domination of a government by and for the wealth of those few, their modus operandi, right from the beginning, was so eloquently challenged by Patrick Henry stating, “I smell a rat”. The selection of Trump as President by the electoral college, the second time in this young century that a candidate who lost the majority vote was thus selected, should serve a sign, as a notice to all citizens that our Constitution is antiquated and the current government does not represent the needs or the wishes of the majority. The United States government does not meet the standards of a Constitutional Republic. Therefore considering the Articles of this Resolution, knowing, believing them to accurately describe the actions of Donald Trump as high crimes and misdemeanors, meaning to make tough moral choices to impeach and try a sitting president, we must all realize that this is the beginning of change not the end, we have the right and duty to begin the process of modifying our Constitution to the point where it becomes a new Constitution, one to be the basis of all this Nations laws, one being capable of guiding the people and those who ascend to leadership positions after a fashion to truly guarantee the promises of the older Declaration of Independence and the older Constitution that now has proven to have failed us all.

Article 1 (count 1), DAPL and Keystone Executive orders

From the first US law concerning the protection of the environment, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948, laws that were passed by Congress concerning regulation of natural resources to prevent unnecessary pollution and depletion of those resources for profit, some of those laws enacted require environmental impact studies of commercial for profit projects such as a pipe line. A pipe line which will benefit a corporate capitalist class of individuals at the expense of citizens and nature itself. The vast majority of monetary benefits of the pipeline will go to the few the already extremely wealthy, that have monopolized wealth to the point of being no less than royal nobility is nothing short of a crime. For President Trump to sign an executive order, to use the office of President to over rule, to bypass laws put in place to protect our natural resources which we all share equally and need for our very survival is criminal in both act and intent.

We believe that a Presidential Executive Order over ruling the permitting process for such projects as determined by U.S. Code › Title 33 › Chapter 26 › Subchapter IV › § 1344 is not only a violation as determined by § 1344(s), but because of the fact that leaks and spills have already occurred since Trump’s decision to demand the pipeline construction and operation proceed without the completion of impact studies required by laws discussed here, we believe 33 USC § 1319 (c) criminal penalties should also apply. An order to, “approve in an expedited manner” and “as satisfying all applicable requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, forgoing a complete permit process” the words of Mr. Trump’s order2 violate environmental law enacted by the US Congress Although accidents and even acts of nature and nature’s God happen and resulting pollution is not considered a criminal or liability due to unforeseeable negligence, when a President knowingly and purposefully approves projects such as this ordering construction and operation to proceed without complete studies, he is accepting the responsibility for any spills and leaks that may have been prevented by a more complete regulatory process. Such leaks did happen in the Dakota Access Pipeline and the Keystone XL Pipeline3 and there is now no way of determining if the leaks and spills would or would not have happened with a proper legal environmental impact study and continuing Congressionally mandated regulations. “Nobody thought any politician would have the guts to approve that final leg. I just closed my eyes, and I said, ‘Do it,” Trump said in a speech in Cincinnati in June of 2017. Two US District Judges have ruled that Trump’s Executive orders involving the DAPL and KXL pipelines may violate the law4 Therefore we consider the executive orders to expedite pipeline construction and operation by forgoing laws enacted by Congress is an impeachable offense.

Here is a report on a 210,000 gallon leak since Trumps Executive Order:

Here is another report of a leak since Trump’s Executive order:

23 U.S. Code § 139 – Efficient environmental reviews for project decisionmaking explains the process that Mr. Trump

Article 2 (count 2), Immigration Executive Orders

There are no articles, sections or clauses in the US Constitution specifically denying Constitutional rights to any human being within its territory, in fact the 14th Amendment in part states, “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Furthermore, the United States Government became a signatory nation to the UN Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees

of 1951 and 1967 on November 1st 19685 . Also, in the interest of expressing the importance this treaty is to the current business at hand of identifying and giving an account of impeachable offenses we must take notice of Article 6, Section 2 of the US Constitution: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”. There is US Code relating to refugees and migrants seeking asylum which does give ultimate authority to the US Attorney General in certain cases involving accusations of immigrant’s involvement in terrorism and certain violent crime, also a consideration of the existence of a Safe Third Country is to be determined by the US Attorney General rather than the courts, which seems to be at odds conflicting with the Constitution as mentioned above, see 8 U.S. Code § 1158 – Asylum. Here are Trump orders

(a)Muslim ban and instigating hate

Trump’s Executive orders concerning refugees from 7 countries relies on false statements related to the 9/11 attacks and does not ban people from Saudi Arabia(15), United Arab Emerates(2), Lebanon(1) or Egypt(1) which the official account of 9/11 claims the hijackers were from. Trump’s Executive Order 13769 signed January 27th 2017 only mentions Syria directly but, he mentions 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12), which include Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen countries in war and turmoil where people with the most legitimate refugee claims would come from. In the case of Iraq his order would ban interpreters and others who aided US soldiers fighting there. Trump’s statement about honor killings is used to include all people from all those countries who do not necessarily practice such old testament based practice. This would be no different than judging all NRA members or for that matter all US citizens by the actions Stephan Paddock the Las Vegas shooter. There are obviously more instances of racism, xenophobia and hate and bigotry in Trump’s immigration executive orders that are a hindrance to US immigration and foreign policy rather than any notion of protecting us. I think legislators should read the actual Executive Orders and the resulting federal court orders stating that Trump’s orders are against the law and unconstitutional. Three of Trumps Executive Orders concerning immigration and refugee policy from Muslim Countries are Order 13769 signed January 27th 2017, Order 13780 March 6, 2017 and Proclamation 9645 September 24, 2017 Proclamation6 , . The Sally Yates letter in as polite of words stated that she is “not convinced that the defense of the Executive Order (13769) is consistent with these responsibilities nor am I convinced that the Executive Order is lawful.”7 All of the “Travel Ban” executive orders had been challenged by interested parties and found to be unconstitutional by multiple federal district and appeals courts in various districts and appeal circuits. Yes the country is divided and it took the appointment of another conservative judge that in conservative situations comes under the ideology that the president has unbridled powers above Congress and even the Constitution, alt-right republicanism gives “Supreme Power” to the elected selected officials rather than to the Constitution and the people.

Jun 26, 2018

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees

The Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, also known as the 1951 Refugee Convention,

(b) Mexican Xenophobe and separating parents from children in detention.

“I will build a great wall — and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me –and I’ll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words.” Donald Trump June 2015

“I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump, a hater. He’s a hater,”, I’ll tell you what it has to do. I’ve had ruling after ruling after ruling that’s been bad rulings, OK? I’ve been treated very unfairly. Before him, we had another judge. If that judge was still there, this case would have been over two years ago. Let me just tell you, I’ve had horrible rulings, I’ve been treated very unfairly by this judge. Now, this judge is of Mexican heritage. I’m building a wall, OK? I’m building a wall. I am going to do very well with the Hispanics, the Mexicans”,”We are building a wall. He’s a Mexican. We’re building a wall between here and Mexico.”

18 U.S. Code § 1521 – Retaliating against a Federal judge or Federal law enforcement officer by false claim or slander of title.

When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems. They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime. They’re rapists and some, I assume, are good people, but I speak to border guards and they’re telling us what we’re getting.” Donald Trump June 2015. “You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people, these are animals, and we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before.”May 16, 2018

I have put in place a zero-tolerance policy for illegal entry on our southwest border. If you cross this border unlawfully, then we will prosecute you. It’s that simple. If you smuggle illegal aliens across our border, then we will prosecute you. If you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you and that child will be separated from you as required by law,” he said. Jeff Sessions May 7th 2018

Zero Tollerence first issued April 11, 2017, memorandum letter made public April 6, 2018

June 15, 2018 During a briefing call today, Homeland Security officials confirmed to reporters that 1,995 children were separated from 1,940 adults at the U.S.-Mexico border from April 19 through May 31. These adults were referred for prosecution after illegally crossing the border.

ICE spends more than $2 billion a year on immigrant detention through private jails…

Mr. Trump’s own inauguration fund collected $500,000 from two private prison companies housing detained migrant families.

Case 2:18-cv-00939 Document 1 Filed 06/26/18 Page 1 of 128

Case 2:18-cv-00939 Document 1 Filed 06/26/18

Article 3 (count), nepotism

Trump, in a statement on Monday announcing the choice (for senior advisor), said Kushner(his son in law) was a “tremendous asset and trusted advisor throughout the campaign and transition.”

Her official title will be assistant to the president; her husband, Jared Kushner, has the title of senior adviser, and also does not get paid.

Kimberly Guilfoyle and Donald Trump Jr. made their hot-and-heavy romance as official as possible by appearing together as a couple at Wednesday’s July Fourth celebration at the White House.

5 U.S. Code § 3110 – Employment of relatives; restrictions

U.S. Code › Title 5 › Part III › Subpart B › Chapter 31 › Subchapter I › § 3110

President Donald Trump’s family appears to have grown richer since he entered the White House. The wealth is coming in because Trump, unlike past presidents, handed control of his businesses over to his children instead of fully divesting from them. The president’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, have similarly stepped down as bosses of their companies but maintained a hand in them.

We conclude that section 3110 [of the U.S. Code] does not bar this appointment,” according to the 14-page memo from the Justice Department. “We believe that the President’s special hiring authority in 3 U.S.C. § 105(a) permits him to make appointments to the White House Office that the anti-nepotism statute might otherwise forbid.”

“We shouldn’t forget why we have these [laws]. It was to try to purify the presidency to a certain respect, or to create more accountability in the people that they appoint,” Julian Zelizer

This issue alone has been watered down by people who do not consider that the Constitution forbids nobility. Although there is a natural, psychological tendency for humans to seek alphas and by definition of republic officials have “supreme power”, we have a Constitution as the highest law of the land not celebrity nobility rule.

Article 4 (count), emoluments clause

Overall, the report found, political groups spent more than $1.2 million at Trump properties during his first year in office, after never having spent more than $100,000 “in any given year going back to at least 2002.”

Corey Ciorciari, policy and research director at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, acknowledged this but said he’s still comfortable with $3.6 million as a reasonable, if not conservative, estimate for the cost of one of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago trips .

$75 million to protect Melania and Barron in New York.

Blumenthal, et al. v. Trump

Blumenthal case is well documented and while it is a civil case it seems of little doubt to prove violation of the Emoluments clause by Donald Trump

In their recent financial disclosure forms, Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner reported more than $500 million in income.


Article 1, section 9:

8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Article 2 section 1:

7: The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

5 U.S. Code § 7342 – Receipt and disposition of foreign gifts and decorations

18 U.S. Code § 209 – Salary of Government officials and employees payable only by United States

18 U.S. Code § 208 – Acts affecting a personal financial interest

18 U.S. Code § 216 – Penalties and injunctions

In their recent financial disclosure forms, Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner reported more than $500 million in income.

Overall, the report found, political groups spent more than $1.2 million at Trump properties during his first year in office, after never having spent more than $100,000 “in any given year going back to at least 2002.”

Corey Ciorciari, policy and research director at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, acknowledged this but said he’s still comfortable with $3.6 million as a reasonable, if not conservative, estimate for the cost of one of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago trips .

$75 million to protect Melania and Barron in New York.

Blumenthal, et al. v. Trump

Blumenthal case is well documented and while it is a civil case it seems of little doubt to prove violation of the Emoluments clause by Donald Trump

Article 5 (count) Conspiracy concerning foreign national election laws

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said on July 27, 2016, the same day the indictment says hackers targeted a domain used by Clinton’s personal office.

Even if the meeting was about “adoptions of Russian children by Americans”, the meeting is still against the law, in fact since private Russian entities not connected to the government do not have any authority concerning such things, so if this alibi, this defense were true it would be even greater proof of the Russian party’s of the June 9, 2016 meeting connection to the Russian government.

Former White House Advisor Stephen Bannon says Donold Trump knew about a meeting between a Russian lawyer and his son, Donald Trump Jr. and that Trump himself may have met Russian contacts the same day. blob:

18 U.S. Code § 953 – Private correspondence with foreign governments

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 744; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

52 U.S. Code § 30121 – Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

18 U.S. Code § 953 – Private correspondence with foreign governments

US Code

Article 6 (count), obstruction concerning Russian US election meddling

Members of the 2016 Trump campaign had several meetings with individuals who had Russian connections. On June 9, 2016, a meeting was held in Trump Tower in New York City between three senior members of the Donald Trump presidential campaign – Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort – and at least five other people, including Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya. The meeting was arranged by publicist and long-time Trump acquantiance, Rob Goldstone on behalf of his client, singer-songwriter Emin Agalarov.[1] It was disclosed to U.S. government officials when Kushner filed a revised version of his security clearance form.[2],

52 U.S. Code § 30121 – Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

18 U.S. Code § 953 – Private correspondence with foreign governments

US Code

This is undeniably probable cause, enough to indict those who attended the meeting. The only thing holding this back is republicans insisting that the President has supreme un-challenge-able executive powers, something that is not written into the Constitution.

The president’s response stated that the meeting “primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children.” It omitted any mention of Clinton.

18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations

Article 7 (count) Money Laundering

Buyers connected to Russia or former Soviet republics made 86 all-cash sales — totaling nearly $109 million — at 10 Trump-branded properties in South Florida and New York City,

The tale of the Trump Toronto illuminates what it means for the US to have a leader whose business model has long depended on exchanging his family name for money with a murky past, no questions asked

Trump accepted Russian money on a personal level, as well; Russian fertilizer magnate Dmitry Rybolovlev’s 2008 purchased of one of Trump’s mansions in Palm Beach for $53 million more than Trump had paid for it four years earlier.

U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 95 › § 1956

18 U.S. Code § 1956 – Laundering of monetary instruments

U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 95 › § 1957

18 U.S. Code § 1957 – Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity

Article 8 (count) Conspiracy

Trump might not have planned well enough to believe he actually would become president but he has certainly planned to use the presidency for personal profits far above and beyond the salary for the position. A conspiracy is a secret agreement by people to commit something wrong or illegal.

Not releasing his taxes or blind trust his businesses. Defrauding the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 371

U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 19 › § 371

18 U.S. Code § 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

Article 9 (count) Treason

When does an ideology, a drive for power and wealth above others become a crime, become unconstitutional, become treasonous? When a small group of people use any means necessary to gain wealth and power over the United States by means which violate the United States Constitution. Not that every president since and including Reagan no matter democrat or republican id not increase the powers and wealth of the aristocracy it is now obvious that Trump is the aristocracy.

Propaganda on it’s own is not a crime it is free speech and the government by law can release, “for domestic distribution, motion 19 pictures, films, videotapes,” ‘Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 H. R. 5736

Trump said he would take down the US Government. Trump put people in Agencies that previously were sued by and sued the agencies

Trump threatens to shut down the government over the border wall.

Bannon impishly declared himself a “Leninist,” saying that the Soviet leader “wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.”

“I always say we have to be unpredictable….predictable is bad.”

Trump wants to abolish the US Postal service which is a constitutionally mandated agency.


18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government

U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 2385

18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

Is dismantling the US government and replacing it with a very private corporate orientated self entitled group of million and billionaires treason or not? If there was just one instance of one of these Articles which are very similar to counts of a criminal complaint I would say no, but obviously this is not the case here. We have an octopus full of testicles designed for a private person to profit off of the presidency.

Republican philosophy once elected the president can do no wrong. We must decide what we want this country to be. The founding fathers did not want a royal class, a two class or a caste system, and even if many of them owned slaves, in theory, every person is to be equal with no titles of nobility. When a small group of un-elected people control the money and the commerce that is exactly what we have. “This Is How the Republican Party Plans to Destroy the Federal Government

The Overthrow Project existed before Trump, but it may not survive his presidency.”

That project could not proceed as smoothly without recent Supreme Court decisions, the first of which named George W Bush to the presidency in 2000. The Citizens Union decision further opened the pockets of party campaign donors and turned individual oligarchs into campaign funders as well. The elimination of Section V of the 1965 Voting Rights act enabled several Southern states to immediately implement old and new voter suppression schemes.

Supreme Court decisions that are anti-worker’s rights. Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. ___ (2018) using binding arbitration agreements as an employer technique to deprives workers of the 7th Amendment Constitutional right to court access and common law, class action (collective) law suits are a long standing basic right.

Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018) is a union busting court order that deprives a majority of workers in a workplace of the right to collective bargaining by removing the financial means of supporting collective bargaining. Collective bargaining, the right to unionize in an internationally recognized human right. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 23, (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Aristocracy is a form of government that places strength in the hands of a small, privileged ruling class.

Since the Citizen’s United v FEC decision, more so than ever the republicans of the congress are doing the bidding of people that are obscenely rich, unimaginably rich compared to the rest of us. Hedge fund operators are on top of the income pyramid, some of them personally gaining over a billion dollars of wealth in a year.

So to break that down, is you worked 40 hours a week for 50 weeks a years that is 2000 hours, so 1,000,000,000/2000 = 500,000 or a half of a million dollars an hour. Certainly only an unconstitutional system of royalty of unconstitutional nobility can account for such a gross range of income inequality.

These people use some of their money to pay for propaganda to support their political agenda. For instance let’s compare the United States Constitution with socialism, socialism is something that capitalist modern neo-republican operatives spend hours upon hours telling people to hate. Here is a definition of socialism:

To keep it short we will just look at the 1st Article, Section 8:

Section 8

1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

2: To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

6: To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

8: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

9: To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

13: To provide and maintain a Navy;

14: To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

16: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

All of these powers are powers that can be equated to socialism because these powers are to be wielded by elected officers whose job is to represent the people of their Districts and States in the United States Government.

Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

Socialism: 1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property

b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

Since Trump and republicans hate socialism and the Constitution contains many Articles synonymous with the meaning of socialism, they are hating and speaking against the United States Constitution. Speech, even hate speech without accompanying acts is not necessarily a crimes let alone treason but acting in ways to promote and allow a noble neo-capitalist class to rule over common people by violating the constitution is exactly treasonous.

“The point is that you can’t be too greedy.” Art of the Deal (1987) p. 48

Quotes from Trump: The Art of the Deal (1987) p. 48 by Donald J. Trump with Tony Schwartz.

Therefore since there is no other Constitution, no other basis for our laws and it is obvious that a private group or class of people have been unconstitutionally meddling with our nation’s economy to profit from nature’s resources and the works of it’s people, we must turn this ship around and bring this crime against nation, humanity and nature to a stop. Although some people view..?… So the conspiracy to effectually void the US Constitution is not the work of Trump alone and Republicans have been working in that direction for a very long time.

When does an ideology become treasonous?

1Article2, Section 4,: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.


***Addendum Posted 3/27/2019: ,

The Republican Guard and their Demolican allies will read this differently but, it is obvious the majority of Trump’s staff is either acting as accomplices or incompetent. Although the founding fathers were nothing short of evil, held African American slaves, were genocidal to the Native Peoples, treated women as possessions, sold European working class immigrants off to the international bankster cartel setting up a monetary system monopolizing weapons dealing war profiteering elite self entitled empire of nobility contrary to their own Constitution; none the less if and when Spanky Bone Spurs is impeached, and found guilty of the crimes we all know he should be charged with, the following Section of Article 2 of the constitution should be interpreted to mean his whole staff infection administration should resign when Trump finally receives his just reward: Section 4

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

“Trumps not dumb. He is your president.” is both a false dichotomy and the old bait and switch typical of Trumpian double speak reverse of logic, Here are a few links about Trump, maybe read a bit of each one of them and watch the video, the if you would like to discuss Trump just leave a reply here, talk to you later have a nice day:

“Trumps not dumb. He is your president.” is both a false dichotomy and the old bait and switch typical of Trumpian double speak reverse of logic. Here are a few links about Trump, maybe read a bit of each one of them and watch the video, then if you would like to discuss Trump just leave a reply here, talk to you later have a nice day: ,

Trump in Iraq:

Flynn is getting a brake compared to Cohen because he is Pentagon Military, the greediest, lying-est criminal division of the monetary system monopolizing, weapons dealing, war profiteering defacto ZioNazi United States Government. If they were hard on Flynn they would all have jail time coming. If there a valid Constitution, if the laws were applied equally, if there were a GOD 99.9% of selected US Government officials and businessmen would be going to prison for war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against nature, mark my words.

I am not a liberal, I am an anarchist, we are all soon to be on a more level playing field. where people who actually work to benefit our nation rather than being ruled by a hierarchy of parasites, until you realize the social economic structure is not based on meritocracy but on a parasitic pyramid, you are a foolish insignificant little circus monkey trained by the organ grinder to bark like a dog, part of the problem rather that part of the solution. ,

Donald Trump, you are such a greedy, lying, megalomaniac, narcissistic pig you cantr even fake being ‘nice’! I almost feel sorry for you! Christmas is a time to be humble appreciative of others and generous, all you have done is Tweet hate and disgust, think about Jesus, think about his words, “treat others as you wish to be treated, Luke 6:31, the least among us shall be our masters, Matthew 25:31, Love Your Enemies, Matthew 5:44”, that is what Christmas is really about Merry Christmas Mr Trump!

Michael J. Geanoulis Sr.: Let’s revisit the 17th Amendment. No! Let’s not revisit the moral ineptitude and unbridled greed of royal white male slave holding landlords who were genocidal towards the native peoples and sold European working class immigrants off to international banksters from the get go. Let us not echo Trump calling democracy, “rule of the mob”. The first state to “ratify” the US Constitution was Delaware, the colony’s population was over 59 thousand people recognized as citizens and who knows how many more Indians, slaves, women and others that were not counted, 30 people signing on to the Constitution is not valid ratification, it is not apporval of a majority of, We the People. As Patrick Henry said, “I smell a rat”. Instead of going back, it is time to go into the future, a future where every person who desires has the right to vote on the laws and appropriations we are all to live under and within. With people like Geanoulis monopolizing the news media for the elite minority, the monetary system monopolizing, weapons dealing, war profiteering ilk in power and wealth. Some individuals are raking in billions of dollars a year like parasites not contributing anything in the system that was corrupt from the get go. Maybe, instead, it is time for a real revolution of the New West ?

America’s founding fathers probably didn’t envision Donald Trump. They did, however, include a sentence in the U.S. Constitution that could curb the activities of a businessman-president. Trump’s decision to keep his stakes in his global business, the Trump Organization, raised the question of whether he is continually violating what’s known as the “emoluments clause.” Critics of the president have filed lawsuits pressing the case.

1. What does the Constitution say?

The foreign emoluments clause — in Article I, Section 9 — reads, “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

2. What does that mean?

Merriam-Webster defines emoluments as “returns arising from office or employment usually in the form of compensation or perquisites.” Historians largely agree that the original intent of the constitutional provision was to discourage early American leaders from being influenced by gifts or titles bestowed by European governments or royalty.

3. Why is this an issue for Trump?

Though he stepped away from day-to-day operations of his businesses, Trump retains ownership in companies that do business with foreign diplomats, state-controlled companies and state-owned television channels. The Trump International Hotel in Manhattan, for instance, got a noticeable revenue boost from a five-day stay by associates of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, according to the Washington Post. The Trump International Hotel Washington, D.C. also gets business from foreign governments and their representatives. It’s also housed in a building that Trump’s company leases from the U.S. government, which raises another issue: A second constitutional clause — in Article II, Section 1 — says the president receives a salary while in office but “shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.”

4. So has Trump accepted an emolument?

That might be for judges to decide. Two lawsuits pressing that argument cite trademarks granted to Trump’s company by China’s government; rent paid at Trump Tower in New York by the Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. and the Abu Dhabi Tourism & Culture Authority; and events booked at Trump’s Washington hotel by the embassy of Kuwait and by a lobbying firm working for Saudi Arabia. The foreign emoluments clause makes Congress the arbiter of whether any of this crosses the legal line. Following their win in the midterm elections, Democrats in the House of Representatives will be able to open an investigation next year.

5. Does Trump acknowledge those were emoluments?

No. His lawyers say fair-market transactions, like when a foreign delegation pays the market rate to stay at a Trump hotel, are permitted. The U.S. Justice Department, defending Trump in court, argued that the strict interpretation being applied by Trump’s critics would mean that “presidents from the very beginning of the Republic, including George Washington, would have received prohibited ‘emoluments.’” Trump pledged early in his presidency to donate to the U.S. Treasury “all profits” from foreign government patronage of his hotels. In March, the Trump Organization said it turned over $151,470 to the U.S. Treasury, representing profits from foreign governments in 2017.

6. Didn’t Trump put his companies in a trust for this reason?

Yes, but it’s not the kind of blind trust that most recent presidents have used to avoid conflicts. The one Trump created is overseen by an independent ethics officer and managed by Trump’s sons, Eric and Don Jr., and Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg. It holds profits from the business for him and allows him to draw money. A blind trust, by contrast, would be run by a fully independent trustee, who would have no contact with Trump and would be the sole decision-maker on keeping, selling or reinvesting Trump’s assets.

7. Who’s suing, and for what?

A lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia accuses Trump of violating the Constitution by holding a financial interest in the Washington hotel. (A federal judge ruled on Nov. 2 that the case can advance to the evidence-gathering stage.) Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, is appealing the dismissal of its lawsuit, which it filed in New York along with a Washington-area restaurant association and luxury hotel event booker that say Trump’s businesses pose unfair competition. In another suit, almost 200 Democratic members of Congress are seeking “the opportunity to cast a binding vote” on the issue, since the Constitution requires the president to obtain “the consent of Congress” before accepting an emolument. A federal judge on Sept. 28 denied the Trump administration’s request to dismiss that one.

8. What does legal precedent tell us?

Not much. It’s exceedingly rare for emoluments to be litigated in court, especially as they relate to the president. But the issue does come up occasionally. In 2009, amid political dueling about whether President Barack Obama could keep his Nobel Peace Prize, the Justice Department advised that there was no emoluments violation because the committee that awards the prize isn’t a “King, Prince, or foreign State.” In 1963, President John F. Kennedy declined an offer of honorary Irish citizenship on the advice of the Justice Department.

–With assistance from Ben Brody.

To contact the reporters on this story: Andrew Harris in Washington at;Bob Van Voris in federal court in Manhattan at;Shahien Nasiripour in New York at

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Leah Harrison Singer at, Laurence Arnold, Joe Schneider

©2018 Bloomberg L.P.

According to the great Trump, McCain is far from a war hero.

He made his feelings on the subject crystal clear during an appearance at the Family leadership Council summit in Iowa:

[John McCain is] not a war hero.

He was a war hero because he was captured.

I like people who weren’t captured.

Indeed Mr. Trump. Indeed.

Now, in case any of you doubters out there are thinking Trump has no right to speak on the subject—given his draft dodging status—think again.

Don’t question the Republican presidential candidate’s bravery…

He may not have been languishing in the Hanoi Hilton, being subjected to unimaginable degrees of torture himself—but, don’t think he was living the high life.

Far from it.

In fact, Trump was suffering through his own personal “Vietnam” and it was every bit as terrifying, terrible and downright torturous as anything those soldier folks were undergoing at the time.

Trump opened up about his “personal Vietnam” during an interview with Howard Stern back in 1997, which resurfaced on Buzzfeed yesterday:

STERN: Now getting back to dating, and when you got to say to a woman, you gotta go to my personal doctor and I’m gonna have you checked out, is that a tough thing to say to a woman?

TRUMP: It’s amazing, I can’t even believe it. I’ve been so lucky in terms of that whole world.

It is a dangerous world out there.

It’s like Vietnam, sort of.

STERN: Hey it’s your personal Vietnam isn’t it?

TRUMP: It is my personal Vietnam.

I feel like a great and very brave soldier!

STERN: A lot of guys who went through Vietnam came out unscathed. A lot of guys going through the ’80s having sex with different women came out with AIDS and all khrough the ’80s having sex with different women came out with AIDS and all kinds of things.

TRUMP: This is better than Vietnam, but it’s uh… it’s more fun.

STERN: A little better, but every vagina is a landmine, haven’t we both said that in private?

TRUMP: [intense laughter] I think it is a potential landmine.

There’s some real danger there.

Sort of like Vietnam Donald.

Sort of.

Same same but different.

Meanwhile, the self-professed “great and very brave soldier” has been continuing to do what he does best—disparaging actual, real, great and brave soldiers.

Last week the Donald trash talked the parents of slain Muslim American soldier, Army Captain Humayun Khan, following their heartfelt and moving speech at the Democratic National Convention

I’ve been in the real world where I don’t repeat Cadet Spanky Bone Spurs lies, I don’t have echolilia, a mental disease like Trumpanzee circus monkeys in the clown show have. Here are some links with sources proving that what you wrote is an ignorant lie: , , So while he is using the presidency as his private for profit business, paying back his Russian oligarch financiers by reversing his statement that the XL and DAPL were to be made with steel made in the USA. The steel was produced in Canada by a Russian oligarch owned company called EVRAZ. Parts of Trump’s border wall of shame are already being made with Russian oligarch steel from the same company. Trump refused to enforce sanctions against Russian oligarchs enacted by Congress. Then there are the Saudi Princes and his windfall to his properties. Guess how much his Golf outings have cost you ignorant fools? “Trump’s total golf expenses—including the cost of his Secret Service detail—currently stand at an estimated $83,000,000, according to; the president played his most recent round on Sunday, Nov. 25, at Trump International.” , , “Judicial Watch, who have vowed to monitor Trump’s travel expenses as closely as they did Obama’s (FOIA requests are already on file), reported in July 2017 that two months into Trump’s presidency taxpayers were already on the hook for $3.58 million in charges for air travel alone (i.e., excluding auxiliary costs such as Secret Service housing, local transporation, police protection, etc.) by the president, first lady, and vice president during February and March. That’s roughly $1.8 million per month, $700,000 more than the Obamas’ monthly average, which included the auxiliary costs we don’t yet have for Trump.”, So obviously the Trump fan club cult are stupid butt hurt monkey azzes who tongue lick feces warm right out of Trump’s azzzzz. YT comment 2/3/19

There is plenty of evidence to indict Trump with numerous high crimes and misdemeanors worthy of impeachment. At this time anybody denying the fact of Trumps crimes should be arrested with him as accomplices. If the whole government was not full of crooks and liars they would be arrested a long time ago. Here are some facts about the criminal con man in chief: Here is Trump talking highly of a sex trafficker and pedophile who got off with a very light sentence. The prosecutor who arranged a deal to quash investigation and indictment of people like Donald Trump and Bill Clinton who both visited ‘sex slave’ was rewarded by Trump with an appointment as Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta:

“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump once said about the convicted sex offender Jeffery Epstein owner of sex slave island. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

Here is a list of many crimes Trump as able to buy or bully his way out of:

Here is Trump cussing while campaigning for President, this is not a crime but this is how pathetic of a person he his yet because of his inheritance stupid moralless people worship him like god:

Here are his Crimes, his executive orders violating the laws written and passed by the US Congress:

Here is a list of what is known about Trumps Russian connections and his Campaign:

Here is evidence that Trump lied to the American people about the XL and DAPL, he promised it would be made from steel made in the USA, a lie is not necessarily a crime but showing favoritism to a company owned by Russian oligarchs I as president is a crime: Trump Reverses Pledge To Mandate U.S. Steel For Keystone Pipeline. A Direct Beneficiary Is A Russian Oligarch With Close Ties To Vladimir Putin

Here is evidence that Trump is again granting contracts to companies that will build the wall with steel from the same Russian Oligarch owned company the pipeline was built with: the BOLLARD WALL (Steel Slats) that Trump wants on the Southern Border are manufactured with “AMERICAN STEEL”…. I put American Steel in quotes because the steel comes from a company called EVRAZ that is indeed located at two locations in America. Guess who OWNS EVRAZ…. the RUSSIANS! (specifically Roman Abramovich and Alexander Abramov: Russian Oligarchs).. And just when steel prices are going through the roof because of Tariffs…. The contract that Trump was talking about in the Rose Garden to upgrade existing barriers in the San Diego area involves 14 miles of steel slat construction by a Texas company SLSCO using EVRAZ steel. FOURTEEN MILES and the cost to AMERICAN TAXPAYERS is 147 MILLION DOLLARS. You don’t have to be a math wizard to figure out that the great deal maker is paying TEN MILLION DOLLARS a MILE for a see through fence.

According to the U.S. Treasury, 114 Russian politicians and 96 Russian oligarchs own stock in Evraz. Abromavich has known ties to Jared and Ivanka and his wife Dasha is a long time friend of Ivanka. REAL EASY TO FACT CHECK!!!!

Trump refused to reinforce sanctions against Russian Oligarchs and unilaterally repealed sanctions against Russian oligarchs passed into law by Congress:

Trump hires illegal aliens at his Golf Courses and other properties: , ,

Trump breaks law for his Saudi Prince buddy:

Trump violates the US Constitution treaty clause concerning the Geneva Convention and civilian war conflict deaths:

NDAA Civilian Casualties Reporting

war crimes